<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Christian Bolton&amp;#39;s SQL Server Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>reference list  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Out of Memory Exception While Attempting to Do SQL CLR at essentially Chris Benard</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/01/07/sql-server-memtoleave-vas-and-64-bit.aspx#11936</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:05:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11936</guid><dc:creator>reference list  » Blog Archive   » Out of Memory Exception While Attempting to Do SQL CLR at essentially Chris Benard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;reference list &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;raquo; Out of Memory Exception While Attempting to Do SQL CLR at essentially Chris Benard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11936" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Websites tagged "biztalk" on Postsaver</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/07/09/customer-advisory-team-biztalk-server-performance-optimization-guide.aspx#11701</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:47:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11701</guid><dc:creator>Websites tagged "biztalk" on Postsaver</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Websites tagged &amp;quot;biztalk&amp;quot; on Postsaver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11701" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server and HBA Queue Depth Mashup</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2009/01/12/tuning-your-san-too-much-hba-queue-depth.aspx#11306</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:32:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11306</guid><dc:creator>Joe Sack's SQL Server WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Using SAN storage for your SQL Server instance? If so, you should take into consideration the host bus&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11306" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>disk sector alignment | keyongtech</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#11274</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:56:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11274</guid><dc:creator>disk sector alignment | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;disk sector alignment | keyongtech&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11274" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tuning your SAN: Too much HBA Queue Depth?</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#11183</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:21:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11183</guid><dc:creator>Christian Bolton's SQL Server Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Modifying the “HBA Queue Depth” is a performance tuning tip for servers that are connected to Storage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11183" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MVP Award for SQL Server</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/10/01/mvp-award-for-sql-server.aspx#10879</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:52:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10879</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks guys! It's a great honour. &amp;nbsp;Congratulations to you as well James!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10879" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MVP Award for SQL Server</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/10/01/mvp-award-for-sql-server.aspx#10873</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:03:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10873</guid><dc:creator>james.rowland-jones</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations Christian! Well deserved..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10873" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MVP Award for SQL Server</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/10/01/mvp-award-for-sql-server.aspx#10860</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:56:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10860</guid><dc:creator>tonyrogerson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well done Christian and well deserved - welcome to the ranks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tony.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10860" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How important is it to understand SQL Server Wait Statistics??</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/06/06/new-sql-server-2008-wait-types-preemptive-and-ft.aspx#10795</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:21:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10795</guid><dc:creator>Desiree's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;To be clear, it is very important to understand wait statistics. It is a key part of tracking down application&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10795" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQLBits: Advanced SQL Server Troubleshooting workshop -  £150 early bird only 3 days left</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/07/24/sqlbits-advanced-sql-server-troubleshooting-workshop.aspx#10712</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:18:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10712</guid><dc:creator>Christian Bolton's SQL Server Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are only 3 days left to take advantage of the 25% early bird discount for this workshop. The full&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10712" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Certified Master Certification just announced</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/06/06/the-microsoft-certified-master-certification-just-announced.aspx#10536</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:01:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10536</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Per Farny, the Program Manager for the Master and Architect certs has posted some more details here: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/trika/archive/2008/06/26/more-on-the-certified-master-programs-from-me-per-the-program-owner.aspx"&gt;blogs.msdn.com/.../more-on-the-certified-master-programs-from-me-per-the-program-owner.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10536" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ist der MCTIP nicht mehr das Ma? der (MS-)Dinge? - MCSEboard.de MCSE Forum</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/06/06/the-microsoft-certified-master-certification-just-announced.aspx#10468</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:57:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10468</guid><dc:creator>Ist der MCTIP nicht mehr das Ma? der (MS-)Dinge? - MCSEboard.de MCSE Forum</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Ist der MCTIP nicht mehr das Ma? der (MS-)Dinge? - MCSEboard.de MCSE Forum&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Disk Sector Alignment</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#8339</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:32:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8339</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Joe,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can tell you for certain that it will only consume 1MB of the first partition because you only need to align the first one. &amp;nbsp;If you think of all the blocks on all the partitions on your disk unravelled into one long piece of string. &amp;nbsp;Sector alignment is kind of like chopping off the fraid bit at the beginning so you have one contiguous perfect piece. &amp;nbsp;You don't need to cut out another piece every time a new partition is defined along the length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As to 1024KB being a catch-all value that is certainly my understanding but I don't claim to be a storage expert. &amp;nbsp;However, if you install Windows Server 2008 it would automatically align the first partition to 1024KB anyway for no other reason than to stop you having to do it which adds some feasibility to my understanding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There's a nice storage whitepaper here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/subsys_perf.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/subsys_perf.mspx&lt;/a&gt; that discusses related stuff but there's nothing in there that'll make your choice any easier unfortunately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Christian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8339" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Disk Sector Alignment</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#8113</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:15:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8113</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are using HP EVA 4100.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We tried asking HP representatives about the right value for sector alignment. At first they didn't know what we're talking about, but then they gave us the number 64...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure if this is the right number for this system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is, can we just use 1024 and be sure that it will work well?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I understand from your post, it will only consume 1Mb of storage for each partition, but will give us the certinty that we are perfectly aligned. Am I correct here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there any problems with setting a bigger number than the actual number?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8113" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Coeo and useful blog posts</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/07/how-to-corrupt-a-page-in-a-specific-index-and-then-fix-it.aspx#6382</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:28:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6382</guid><dc:creator>Justin Langford's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've worked with Christian Bolton for a number of years - and known him a few years longer! Since establishing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6382" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>