<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Christian Bolton&amp;#39;s SQL Server Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: MVP Award for SQL Server</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/10/01/mvp-award-for-sql-server.aspx#10879</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:52:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10879</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks guys! It's a great honour. &amp;nbsp;Congratulations to you as well James!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10879" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MVP Award for SQL Server</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/10/01/mvp-award-for-sql-server.aspx#10873</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:03:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10873</guid><dc:creator>james.rowland-jones</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations Christian! Well deserved..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10873" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MVP Award for SQL Server</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/10/01/mvp-award-for-sql-server.aspx#10860</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:56:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10860</guid><dc:creator>tonyrogerson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well done Christian and well deserved - welcome to the ranks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tony.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10860" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How important is it to understand SQL Server Wait Statistics??</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/06/06/new-sql-server-2008-wait-types-preemptive-and-ft.aspx#10795</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:21:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10795</guid><dc:creator>Desiree's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;To be clear, it is very important to understand wait statistics. It is a key part of tracking down application&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10795" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQLBits: Advanced SQL Server Troubleshooting workshop -  £150 early bird only 3 days left</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/07/24/sqlbits-advanced-sql-server-troubleshooting-workshop.aspx#10712</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:18:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10712</guid><dc:creator>Christian Bolton's SQL Server Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are only 3 days left to take advantage of the 25% early bird discount for this workshop. The full&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10712" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Certified Master Certification just announced</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/06/06/the-microsoft-certified-master-certification-just-announced.aspx#10536</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:01:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10536</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Per Farny, the Program Manager for the Master and Architect certs has posted some more details here: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/trika/archive/2008/06/26/more-on-the-certified-master-programs-from-me-per-the-program-owner.aspx"&gt;blogs.msdn.com/.../more-on-the-certified-master-programs-from-me-per-the-program-owner.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10536" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ist der MCTIP nicht mehr das Ma? der (MS-)Dinge? - MCSEboard.de MCSE Forum</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/06/06/the-microsoft-certified-master-certification-just-announced.aspx#10468</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:57:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10468</guid><dc:creator>Ist der MCTIP nicht mehr das Ma? der (MS-)Dinge? - MCSEboard.de MCSE Forum</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Ist der MCTIP nicht mehr das Ma? der (MS-)Dinge? - MCSEboard.de MCSE Forum&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Disk Sector Alignment</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#8339</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:32:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8339</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Joe,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can tell you for certain that it will only consume 1MB of the first partition because you only need to align the first one. &amp;nbsp;If you think of all the blocks on all the partitions on your disk unravelled into one long piece of string. &amp;nbsp;Sector alignment is kind of like chopping off the fraid bit at the beginning so you have one contiguous perfect piece. &amp;nbsp;You don't need to cut out another piece every time a new partition is defined along the length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As to 1024KB being a catch-all value that is certainly my understanding but I don't claim to be a storage expert. &amp;nbsp;However, if you install Windows Server 2008 it would automatically align the first partition to 1024KB anyway for no other reason than to stop you having to do it which adds some feasibility to my understanding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There's a nice storage whitepaper here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/subsys_perf.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/subsys_perf.mspx&lt;/a&gt; that discusses related stuff but there's nothing in there that'll make your choice any easier unfortunately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Christian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8339" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Disk Sector Alignment</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#8113</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:15:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8113</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are using HP EVA 4100.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We tried asking HP representatives about the right value for sector alignment. At first they didn't know what we're talking about, but then they gave us the number 64...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure if this is the right number for this system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is, can we just use 1024 and be sure that it will work well?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I understand from your post, it will only consume 1Mb of storage for each partition, but will give us the certinty that we are perfectly aligned. Am I correct here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there any problems with setting a bigger number than the actual number?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8113" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Coeo and useful blog posts</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/07/how-to-corrupt-a-page-in-a-specific-index-and-then-fix-it.aspx#6382</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:28:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6382</guid><dc:creator>Justin Langford's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've worked with Christian Bolton for a number of years - and known him a few years longer! Since establishing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6382" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Coeo and useful blog posts</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#6381</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:28:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6381</guid><dc:creator>Justin Langford's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've worked with Christian Bolton for a number of years - and known him a few years longer! Since establishing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6381" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Coeo and useful blog posts</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/01/07/sql-server-memtoleave-vas-and-64-bit.aspx#6380</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:28:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6380</guid><dc:creator>Justin Langford's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've worked with Christian Bolton for a number of years - and known him a few years longer! Since establishing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6380" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Disk Sector Alignment</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#6248</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:03:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6248</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comments. &amp;nbsp;Post a link if you find those documents :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6248" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Disk Sector Alignment</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk-sector-alignment.aspx#6240</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:09:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6240</guid><dc:creator>HumbleDBA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just found your blog...a little gold mine for the DBA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've come across this too, and funnily enough, when speaking to the EMC SAN Vendor they knew about this but didn't implement initially. We were in a high perfomance environment where every ounce of performance was needed. We got changes made to align the Sectors. We certainly saw some quite significant improvements too (some approx 20% - I have a doc somewhere, which I'll try and dig out, which suggests improvements of up to 30% may be achieved in some environments).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great stuff, Christian. And I look forward to the book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6240" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>http://blogs.solidq.com/en/rdyess/lists/posts/post.aspx?id=8</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2008/01/07/sql-server-memtoleave-vas-and-64-bit.aspx#6202</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:32:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6202</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6202" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>