<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Grumpy Old DBA</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/default.aspx</link><description>The Grumpy Old DBA is an independent DBA who usually specialises in production support 
and the performance, tuning and optimisation of databases and applications.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Don't always believe your system procs - they may lie !</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/22/don-t-always-believe-your-system-procs-they-may-lie.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:13123</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=13123</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/22/don-t-always-believe-your-system-procs-they-may-lie.aspx#comments</comments><description>It&amp;#39;s sometimes interesting how a simple thing can catch you out! I have a set of routines which handle the process of restoring copies of databases on other servers, it also supports full blown log shipping but has various other functionality. Generally...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/22/don-t-always-believe-your-system-procs-they-may-lie.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13123" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Things+I+hate/default.aspx">Things I hate</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category></item><item><title>If you have Enterprise Servers you should read this blog</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/18/if-you-have-enterprise-servers-you-should-read-this-blog.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:13106</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=13106</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/18/if-you-have-enterprise-servers-you-should-read-this-blog.aspx#comments</comments><description>I feel that a DBA should have a good working understanding of the underlying server that SQL Server sits upon and the storage system(s) that it connects to, otherwise you may not know if you&amp;#39;re being spun a yarn when you&amp;#39;re trying to understand...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/18/if-you-have-enterprise-servers-you-should-read-this-blog.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13106" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Clustering/default.aspx">Clustering</category></item><item><title>Print vs Select - security through obscurity ?</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/10/print-vs-select-security-through-obscurity.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:13032</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=13032</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/10/print-vs-select-security-through-obscurity.aspx#comments</comments><description>Now here&amp;#39;s an interesting snippet which I&amp;#39;m sure will provoke a few &amp;quot; ... and you didn&amp;#39;t know that! &amp;quot; comments. I wanted to take the output from a stored procedure into a table using the insert into mytable exec proc; command but...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/10/print-vs-select-security-through-obscurity.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13032" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category></item><item><title>Detach a database and take out a cluster.</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/01/detach-a-database-and-take-out-a-cluster.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12966</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12966</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/01/detach-a-database-and-take-out-a-cluster.aspx#comments</comments><description>During testing I managed to take my SQL 2008 cluster offline by simply detaching a database. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189128.aspx explaining the background. When you detach a database the ntfs file permissions go to the account that...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/02/01/detach-a-database-and-take-out-a-cluster.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Clustering/default.aspx">Clustering</category></item><item><title>Index Rebuild Observations</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/01/28/index-rebuild-observations.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:38:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12945</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12945</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/01/28/index-rebuild-observations.aspx#comments</comments><description>As part of a series of migration tests carrying out an all index rebuild on a user database has been used to compare relative performance. As the application is a true 7 x 24, there are no maintenance windows so index rebuilds are very intrusive and elicit...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/01/28/index-rebuild-observations.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12945" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Code+Tuning/default.aspx">Code Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Indexes/default.aspx">Indexes</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Benchmarks/default.aspx">Benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Setting Environment variables</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/01/27/setting-environment-variables.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:44:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12935</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12935</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/01/27/setting-environment-variables.aspx#comments</comments><description>Now you may well ask what on earth windows server environment variables have to do with SQL Server, and it&amp;#39;s a fair question and only relevant in certain circumstances. I&amp;#39;m currently running a series of replay profiler traces on a server, I need...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2010/01/27/setting-environment-variables.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12935" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category></item><item><title>Well there's a thing</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/27/well-there-s-a-thing.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12461</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12461</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/27/well-there-s-a-thing.aspx#comments</comments><description>Just noticed this post from the PSS Team http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/archive/2009/10/26/reduce-locking-and-other-needs-when-updating-data-better-performance.aspx never knew you could do double assignment x = y = z....(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/27/well-there-s-a-thing.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Code+Tuning/default.aspx">Code Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Technical+Links/default.aspx">Technical Links</category></item><item><title>Greenwash and ROI</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/25/greenwash-and-roi.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:48:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12452</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12452</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/25/greenwash-and-roi.aspx#comments</comments><description>First up let&amp;#39;s make clear I do support most things green, or greener, however I feel that so much is talked green but misses critical information, e.g. the point of it in the first place. I was reading about the usual sucess story of how virtualisation...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/25/greenwash-and-roi.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12452" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category></item><item><title>When does 2+2 != 4 ?</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/21/when-does-2-2-4.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12447</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12447</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/21/when-does-2-2-4.aspx#comments</comments><description>Disclaimer: Results and observations are from a specific series of tests using sql 2008 enterprise on windows 2008 enterprise. I&amp;#39;ve been working on a series of benchmarking tests for an application with the aim of showing scaling of the storage for...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/10/21/when-does-2-2-4.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12447" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SAN/default.aspx">SAN</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Benchmarks/default.aspx">Benchmarks</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Storage/default.aspx">Storage</category></item><item><title>Windows 2008 build fun and games.</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/08/17/windows-2008-build-fun-and-games.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:59:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:12145</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12145</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/08/17/windows-2008-build-fun-and-games.aspx#comments</comments><description>I run a number of test servers at home, these are technically PCs running a server o/s, these currently number 6. I generally build these myself with a base spec of supporting 8GB ram in 4 slots, a minimum of a dual core proc and at least one x16 pci...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/08/17/windows-2008-build-fun-and-games.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12145" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/x64/default.aspx">x64</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category></item><item><title>Build Your Own Cluster</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/06/03/build-your-own-cluster.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11803</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11803</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/06/03/build-your-own-cluster.aspx#comments</comments><description>In case you&amp;#39;ve all missed this you can now build a real cluster with just three machines http://blogs.msdn.com/clustering/archive/2009/05/14/9613924.aspx Windows 2008 Storage Server is now available for msdn and technet download, as the man says now&amp;#39;s...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/06/03/build-your-own-cluster.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Technical+Links/default.aspx">Technical Links</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Storage/default.aspx">Storage</category></item><item><title>Storage – The Final Frontier</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/05/04/storage-the-final-frontier.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11598</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11598</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/05/04/storage-the-final-frontier.aspx#comments</comments><description>This is the presentation for the UK SSUG that I gave the other night. The link below is a pdf of all the slides and the script / notes that I wrote to go with each slide.&amp;#160; I’ve not edited this for style or anything – this is as I worked out what...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/05/04/storage-the-final-frontier.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11598" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SAN/default.aspx">SAN</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Benchmarks/default.aspx">Benchmarks</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Storage/default.aspx">Storage</category></item><item><title>Parallel Worlds or slipped reality?</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/30/parallel-worlds-or-slipped-reality.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11504</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11504</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/30/parallel-worlds-or-slipped-reality.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’ve been planning a post on the subject of parallelism for some considerable time but the inability to be able to present reproducible tests for illustration had been a major concern. Things change however, I picked up on an interesting post&amp;#160; http...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/30/parallel-worlds-or-slipped-reality.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11504" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category></item><item><title>How to determine that hardware DEP is available and configured on your computer</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/19/how-to-determine-that-hardware-dep-is-available-and-configured-on-your-computer.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11467</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11467</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/19/how-to-determine-that-hardware-dep-is-available-and-configured-on-your-computer.aspx#comments</comments><description>Well here we are again with another post I’d been saving up until I resolved the images issue. DEP and how it affects memory on your SQL Server!!! Microsoft KB: 912923&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; MICROSOFT KB: 875352 ===========================================...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/19/how-to-determine-that-hardware-dep-is-available-and-configured-on-your-computer.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11467" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/memory/default.aspx">memory</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/x64/default.aspx">x64</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/912923+++875352++DEP+Memory/default.aspx">912923   875352  DEP Memory</category></item><item><title>x64 Memory Problems</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/18/x64-memory-problems.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:11461</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11461</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/18/x64-memory-problems.aspx#comments</comments><description>(&amp;#160; I’m hopeful that Livewriter will enable me to publish a blog post which includes screen shots as this one has a large number! ) Please READ everything and the documentation with the download before you install this I’ve blogged about memory issues...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2009/03/18/x64-memory-problems.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/memory/default.aspx">memory</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/x64/default.aspx">x64</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/x64+Memory+and+SQL+Server/default.aspx">x64 Memory and SQL Server</category></item></channel></rss>