<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Grumpy Old DBA</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/default.aspx</link><description>The Grumpy Old DBA is an independent DBA who usually specialises in production support 
and the performance, tuning and optimisation of databases and applications.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Performance Dashboard for SQL 2008</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/23/performance-dashboard-for-sql-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10506</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10506</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/23/performance-dashboard-for-sql-2008.aspx#comments</comments><description>Just in case you haven&amp;#39;t seen this http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/thepremiers/archive/2008/06/20/sql-server-2008-performance-studio.aspx then have a read. As I actually create dashboards and performance reporting for sql 2000 and sql 2008, and have...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/23/performance-dashboard-for-sql-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10506" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Trending+and+Statistics/default.aspx">Trending and Statistics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SQL2008/default.aspx">SQL2008</category></item><item><title>Tracking problem indexes in SQL 2000</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/10/tracking-problem-indexes-in-sql-2000.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10464</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10464</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/10/tracking-problem-indexes-in-sql-2000.aspx#comments</comments><description>It’s all so easy(ish) to work within SQL 2005 but the reality is that there are still more SQL 2000 databases than SQL 2005, so I’m told, and I’m supporting one of them right now. I’ve been contemplating on how to get a handle on which of my indexes are...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/10/tracking-problem-indexes-in-sql-2000.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10464" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Indexes/default.aspx">Indexes</category></item><item><title>Dates - especially when SQL Server can't be British!</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/09/dates-especially-when-sql-server-can-t-be-british.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10462</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10462</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/09/dates-especially-when-sql-server-can-t-be-british.aspx#comments</comments><description>Just like memory config dates never seem to go away and I&amp;#39;ve had some discussions with our BI team recently on why things were not working quite as expected, especially on the 13th of the month; and I noticed the same issue had arisen for a member...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/06/09/dates-especially-when-sql-server-can-t-be-british.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Best+Practice/default.aspx">Best Practice</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category></item><item><title>Covering Clustered Indexes</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/05/26/covering-clustered-indexes.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10436</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10436</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/05/26/covering-clustered-indexes.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’ve noticed that of late I’ve become a bit more critical of a well known publication that I suspect many DBA’s read. I have subscriptions to a number of publications and for the ones that I pay for I’m generally quite content. I like paper / hard copy...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/05/26/covering-clustered-indexes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10436" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Indexes/default.aspx">Indexes</category></item><item><title>Information Overload ??</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/05/01/information-overload.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10362</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10362</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/05/01/information-overload.aspx#comments</comments><description>As I&amp;#39;ve remarked before the profusion of Blogs ( from the various Microsoft teams and individuals ) whilst exposing so much more information then we ever had before also requires you to almost spend all your time just checking every blog you can find...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/05/01/information-overload.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10362" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Technical+Links/default.aspx">Technical Links</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/x64/default.aspx">x64</category></item><item><title>Come to the UK SSUG</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/18/come-to-the-uk-ssug.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10334</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10334</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/18/come-to-the-uk-ssug.aspx#comments</comments><description>Support your local user group! If you missed out on attending the UK SSUG Meeting in London last night then you missed an excellent evening, OK if you can&amp;#39;t get to London Victoria beacuse you&amp;#39;re in Scotland fair enough, but with the close proximity...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/18/come-to-the-uk-ssug.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10334" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Training+_2600_amp_3B00_+Certification/default.aspx">Training &amp;amp; Certification</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Best+Practice/default.aspx">Best Practice</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Technical+Links/default.aspx">Technical Links</category></item><item><title>Disappointing Review.</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/17/disappointing-review.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10330</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10330</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/17/disappointing-review.aspx#comments</comments><description>It&amp;#39;s not very often I&amp;#39;m provoked into making a criticism of a respected publication, however there&amp;#39;s nothing like being grumpy! I&amp;#39;ve published a number of posts about baselines, trending and performance analysis and I&amp;#39;ve been quick...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/17/disappointing-review.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10330" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Things+I+hate/default.aspx">Things I hate</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Trending+and+Statistics/default.aspx">Trending and Statistics</category></item><item><title>Disk Partition Alignment  ( SANs and Diskpart )</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/03/disk-partition-alignment-sans-and-diskpart.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10289</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10289</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/03/disk-partition-alignment-sans-and-diskpart.aspx#comments</comments><description>As a further post to my series on what else can affect SQL Server Performance here’s the thorny issue of disk partition alignment. Disclaimer : I don’t get to configure SANs, places I work have dedicated teams and it’s unlikely a DBA would be considered...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/04/03/disk-partition-alignment-sans-and-diskpart.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10289" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/SAN/default.aspx">SAN</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category></item><item><title>Configuring x64 SQL Server </title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/26/configuring-x64-sql-server.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10237</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10237</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/26/configuring-x64-sql-server.aspx#comments</comments><description>I often read a number of forum posts concerning performance / configuration issues with x64 SQL Server. I&amp;#39;ve also found some interesting views on how much memory you can allocate to SQL Server on a x64 install ( I don&amp;#39;t have any experience of...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/26/configuring-x64-sql-server.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10237" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/x64/default.aspx">x64</category></item><item><title>Do you really need those services?</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/25/do-you-really-need-those-services.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10236</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10236</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/25/do-you-really-need-those-services.aspx#comments</comments><description>As a continuation of my series of posts which look at Windows Server rather than SQL Server here&amp;#39;s one about services. o When your SQL Server is under pressure stopping or disabling unnecessary services may free up resource. o This is especially true...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/25/do-you-really-need-those-services.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10236" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category></item><item><title>Bug in UK SSUG 2008</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/19/bug-in-uk-ssug-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:9649</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9649</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/19/bug-in-uk-ssug-2008.aspx#comments</comments><description>It was discovered earlier today that SSUG 2008 was unable to distinguish a Thursday when it fell before a bank holiday friday and as a consequence SSUG would be unable to function on March 20th. It's not thought that other Thursdays that fall before a...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/19/bug-in-uk-ssug-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9649" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Trending+and+Statistics/default.aspx">Trending and Statistics</category></item><item><title>Things that may not be right on your  SQL server.</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/12/things-that-may-not-be-right-on-your-sql-server.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:9353</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9353</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/12/things-that-may-not-be-right-on-your-sql-server.aspx#comments</comments><description>Ø When performance is under the spotlight most often the finger is pointed at SQL Server, here’s a short list of things that may impact your server performance. Disclaimer : This is my personal hit list and in no particular order. Out of date drivers...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/03/12/things-that-may-not-be-right-on-your-sql-server.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9353" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/operating+systems/default.aspx">operating systems</category></item><item><title>Only once every four years thank goodness!</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/29/only-once-every-four-years-thank-goodness.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8142</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8142</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/29/only-once-every-four-years-thank-goodness.aspx#comments</comments><description>I never cease to be amazed by what I discover within IT, mostly these days I'm more disappointed than anything else, I'm not a lover of the let's bash Microsoft about security patches or we should all use Linux / Open source as in the latter I'm sure...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/29/only-once-every-four-years-thank-goodness.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8142" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Things+I+hate/default.aspx">Things I hate</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category></item><item><title>dbcc dropcleanbuffers - or maybe not</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/22/dbcc-dropcleanbuffers-or-maybe-not.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7669</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7669</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/22/dbcc-dropcleanbuffers-or-maybe-not.aspx#comments</comments><description>As a consequence of another action I was prompted to want to clear the buffer cache – or to be more precise I tried to clear the buffer cache. So stepping back, what happens if you install more memory than the combined size of your databases? Most would...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/22/dbcc-dropcleanbuffers-or-maybe-not.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7669" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/File+Under+Grumpy/default.aspx">File Under Grumpy</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Diagnostics/default.aspx">Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/General+Tuning/default.aspx">General Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/memory/default.aspx">memory</category></item><item><title>Analysing Indexes Summary</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/18/analysing-indexes-summary.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7469</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7469</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/18/analysing-indexes-summary.aspx#comments</comments><description>· I’ve put the work I’ve done on using the dmvs to analyse indexes onto my web site – the links to the pages are underneath. Trying to post large documents to the blog is very difficult, and probably not what a blog was intended for! · I need to do more...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/2008/02/18/analysing-indexes-summary.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7469" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Trending+and+Statistics/default.aspx">Trending and Statistics</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/archive/tags/Indexes/default.aspx">Indexes</category></item></channel></rss>