<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>StevenWhite</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Microsoft recommendations on SQL Server service accounts.....</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/08/27/981.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:981</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=981</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/08/27/981.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;P&gt;I've been spending some time reading up on the SQL 2005 Papers.&lt;BR&gt;If you haven't taken a look, there is lots of interesting things to read. Well worth a browse espically the operations section. &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/library/default.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/library/default.mspx&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;br&gt;Anyway it would be nice to see consistant advice from MS about sql service accounts....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp; 'Setting Up Windows Service Accounts'&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;document is states &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Microsoft recommends that you do not use the Network Service account for the SQL Server or SQL Server Agent services. Local User or Domain User accounts are more appropriate for these SQL services. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;(&lt;A href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504.aspx"&gt;http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504.aspx&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Whereas in the 'Physical Database Storage Design' paper&amp;nbsp; it recommends '&lt;EM&gt;Use the Windows Network Service Account for security&lt;/EM&gt;.'&lt;BR&gt;(&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/physdbstor.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/physdbstor.mspx&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Happy Reading&lt;BR&gt;Steven&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=981" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Run away framework.log file (eating up the space on the c drive)</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/06/29/853.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:853</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=853</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/06/29/853.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;P&gt;Today I noticed that the space on the c drive on one of my sql 2005 servers was going down. After investigation I found that the &lt;FONT face=Arial size=2&gt;c:\windows\system32\wbem\log\Framework.log file was growing above the 64k limit.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Afterway after a quick search I found the fix &lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=836605"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=836605&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Steven&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=853" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>TheRegister interview with Jim Gray</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/05/30/766.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 13:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:766</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=766</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/05/30/766.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;P&gt;The register have just posted an interview with Jim Gray&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800080&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2006/05/30/jim_gray/"&gt;http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2006/05/30/jim_gray/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800080&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=766" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 SP1</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/04/20/414.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:414</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=414</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/04/20/414.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Well I've installed this on my desktop (Core DB, tools and reporting services), and all seems well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see that MS have improved the delivery of the service pack, no more expanding the files into a directory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just waiting&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;for the updated BOL and MOM packs :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=414" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 Report Pack for Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server 2003 - Error</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/03/28/413.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:413</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=413</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/03/28/413.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;font size=2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those of you thinking of&amp;nbsp;using the new '&lt;strong&gt;SQL Server 2005 Report Pack for Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server 2003&lt;/strong&gt; ' to report on your own sharepoint sites,&amp;nbsp;there in a minor script error in the dbSPSReporting.sql script which is used to create a empty database.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size=2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basically there is a comma missing after WSSDoc field in&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;stored procedure usp_Insert_FactWSS &lt;br /&gt;which causes the stored procedure not to be created.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix is to add a comma at the end of the line.&lt;br /&gt;ie.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;WSSDoc &lt;font color=#0000ff size=2&gt;nvarchar&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color=#808080 size=2&gt;(&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=2&gt;255&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color=#808080 size=2&gt;),&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color=#808080 size=2&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color=#808080 size=2&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=413" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Memory manangement on 64bit version of SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/02/21/408.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:408</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=408</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/02/21/408.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I noticed that in the x64 version of Management Studio we have the 'Enable AWE' memory. Why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Books online it states that '64-bit applications do not require AWE because access to memory is not limited to 4&amp;nbsp;GB'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If that is the case why have the option available on the 64bit version of the product?&lt;br /&gt;What does it do?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=408" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interesting SQL security article</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/02/14/407.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:407</guid><dc:creator>StevenWhite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=407</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/stevenwhite/archive/2006/02/14/407.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;On one of my regular visits to &lt;a href="http://www.sqlsecurity.com"&gt;http://www.sqlsecurity.com&lt;/a&gt; I noticed a link plugging an interesting article called ‘Article on 10 tricks attackers use to access SQL Server’. Anyway the&amp;nbsp;article can be&amp;nbsp;found&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid87_gci1165052_tax301336,00.html?track=NL-464&amp;amp;ad=541873&amp;amp;adg=301324&amp;amp;bucket=ETA’" ref="’http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid87_gci1165052_tax301336,00.html?track=NL-464&amp;amp;ad=541873&amp;amp;adg=301324&amp;amp;bucket=ETA’"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steven&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>