<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rob&amp;#39;s SQL Blog</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/default.aspx</link><description>... and other random thoughts</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>SQL Server Waits, Locks and Blocking</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/05/17/sql-server-waits-locks-and-blocking.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10402</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10402</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/05/17/sql-server-waits-locks-and-blocking.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;b&gt;master.dbo.sysprocesses&lt;/b&gt; table in Microsoft SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 is a system table that contains information about the active server process IDs (SPIDs) that are running on SQL Server. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you are using SQL Server 2005, you can also access this table by using the &lt;b&gt;sys.sysprocesses&lt;/b&gt; compatibility view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;b&gt;waittype&lt;/b&gt; column, the &lt;b&gt;lastwaittype&lt;/b&gt; column, the &lt;b&gt;waittime&lt;/b&gt; column, and the &lt;b&gt;waitresource&lt;/b&gt; column in the &lt;b&gt;master.dbo.sysprocesses&lt;/b&gt; system table provide information about the resources that the processes are waiting on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;References:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;a class="" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/271509" target="_blank"&gt;How to monitor blocking in SQL Server 2005 and in SQL Server 2000&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;a class="" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191168.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Blocked Process Report Event Class&lt;br /&gt;Description of the waittype and lastwaittype columns in the master.dbo.sysprocesses table in SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cross Posted from &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/rob" target="_new"&gt;blogs.technet.com/rob&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10402" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server and Windows Memory</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/05/15/sql-server-and-windows-memory.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10399</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10399</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/05/15/sql-server-and-windows-memory.aspx#comments</comments><description>SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition introduced support for the&amp;nbsp;use of Windows 2000 Address Windowing Extensions (AWE) to address 8GB of memory on Windows 2000 Advanced Server and 32GB of memory on Windows 2000 Datacentre. With AWE, SQL Server can reserve memory not in use by other applications and the OS. Each instance must statically allocate the memory it needs. AWE memory can only be used for the data cache and not for executables, drivers, DLL&amp;#39;s, etc. 
&lt;p&gt;Cross Posted from blogs.technet.com/rob&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10399" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Windows/default.aspx">Windows</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Memory/default.aspx">Memory</category></item><item><title>Windows Memory (PAE/AWE/3GB)</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/05/15/windows-memory-and-sql-server.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10398</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10398</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/05/15/windows-memory-and-sql-server.aspx#comments</comments><description>SQL Server 2000 Enterrise Edition introduced support for the&amp;nbsp;use of Windows &amp;nbsp; 
&lt;p&gt;Cross Posted from blogs.technet.com/rob&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10398" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Unbreakable... Not a Chance !</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/04/17/oracle-unbreakable-not-a-chance.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:10324</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10324</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/04/17/oracle-unbreakable-not-a-chance.aspx#comments</comments><description>Good article here comparing the Critical Updates fixes between SQL Server and Oracle and some of the mis-information peddled in the RDBMS world. Highlights include zero SQL Server critical update vulnerabilities since September 2004, which I think is...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/04/17/oracle-unbreakable-not-a-chance.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10324" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2000 Full-Text Issues After Failover</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/03/12/SQL-Server-2000-full-text-issues-after-failover.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:9348</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9348</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/03/12/SQL-Server-2000-full-text-issues-after-failover.aspx#comments</comments><description>I can't take credit for finding the solution to this as that goes to my colleague, but I thought I'd share a problem we experienced after failing over one of our production clusters last night. This is a SQL Server 2000 SP4 Enterprise Edition active/passive...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/03/12/SQL-Server-2000-full-text-issues-after-failover.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9348" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Clustering/default.aspx">Clustering</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2000/default.aspx">2000</category></item><item><title>SQL2K8 Launch Thoughts</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/29/sql2k8-launch-issues.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8141</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8141</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/29/sql2k8-launch-issues.aspx#comments</comments><description>Been reading Dan Jones blog post regarding the delay to the launch of SQL Server 2008, and I think he makes some great points. There is obviously dissapointment from some people about the release date slipping back, but as Dan points out, a bad product...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/29/sql2k8-launch-issues.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8141" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category></item><item><title>Windows Server 2008 Clustering</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/29/windows-server-2008-clustering.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:8140</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8140</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/29/windows-server-2008-clustering.aspx#comments</comments><description>I've been having a look at Windows Server 2008 clustering and the first thing I can say is... wow ! Setting up clusters, adding additional nodes and setting up clustered resources is far simpler than before, and the cluster validation tool means there...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/29/windows-server-2008-clustering.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8140" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Windows/default.aspx">Windows</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Clustering/default.aspx">Clustering</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Resources/default.aspx">Resources</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Training/default.aspx">Training</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 Bug Report</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/21/humorous-sql-server-bug-report.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7614</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7614</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/21/humorous-sql-server-bug-report.aspx#comments</comments><description>Saw this link to a SQL Server 2005 bug report on the Microsoft Connect site. I guess someone was having one of those days https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=253524&amp;amp;wa=wsignin1.0...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/21/humorous-sql-server-bug-report.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7614" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2005/default.aspx">2005</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 Certifications</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/19/sql-server-2008-certifications.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7534</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7534</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/19/sql-server-2008-certifications.aspx#comments</comments><description>As I am currently preparing for the MCDBA to MCITP 2005 upgrade exam (70-447) it may seem a bit premature to talk about SQL Server 2008 certifications, but there is a webcast available at Trika's blog (from the Microsoft Learning team) below. http://blogs...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/19/sql-server-2008-certifications.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7534" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2005/default.aspx">2005</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2000/default.aspx">2000</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Certification/default.aspx">Certification</category></item><item><title>Indexing Strategies</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/16/indexing-strategies.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7389</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7389</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/16/indexing-strategies.aspx#comments</comments><description>I attended the Scottish SQL Server User Group meeting during the week and heard a presentation from Martin Bell on his favourite DMV's. Mentioned in the discussion was sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats and that got me thinking about indexing strategies. I have...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/16/indexing-strategies.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7389" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category></item><item><title>PFE Technical Rollups</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/15/technical-rollup-mail-feb-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7354</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7354</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/15/technical-rollup-mail-feb-2008.aspx#comments</comments><description>The latest Technical rollup mails from Premier Field Engineering are available here ....(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/15/technical-rollup-mail-feb-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7354" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category></item><item><title>Top Tips for SQL Server Clustering </title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/13/top-tips-for-sql-server-clustering.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7288</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7288</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/13/top-tips-for-sql-server-clustering.aspx#comments</comments><description>As part of a current project I am working on, I came across this article , which includes a tip for clustering SQL Server workgroup edition using a combination of Windows clustering and virtual server !...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/13/top-tips-for-sql-server-clustering.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7288" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2005/default.aspx">2005</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Windows/default.aspx">Windows</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/Clustering/default.aspx">Clustering</category></item><item><title>SQL 2008 Resource Governor</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/12/sql-2008-resource-governor.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7190</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7190</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/12/sql-2008-resource-governor.aspx#comments</comments><description>I came across this post in Andrew Fryer's blog, which has a short demo of the SQL Server 2008 resource governor in action. For me, this will be one of the main drivers for moving to SQL Server 2008. Most of the issues I come across with unresponsive SQL...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/12/sql-2008-resource-governor.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category></item><item><title>Free SQL Server 2008 E-Learning Available</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/11/free-sql-server-2008-e-learning-available.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:7133</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7133</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/11/free-sql-server-2008-e-learning-available.aspx#comments</comments><description>There are some free e-learning tools available for SQL Server 2008 on the Microsoft E-learning site below: http://www.microsoft.com/learning/sql/2008/default.mspx There's also some free e-learning resourses for Windows Server 2008 here: http://www.microsoft...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/11/free-sql-server-2008-e-learning-available.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7133" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category></item><item><title>Update: Two-thirds of Oracle DBAs don't apply security patches</title><link>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/08/update-two-thirds-of-oracle-dbas-don-t-apply-security-patches.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa8c4e8e-46a3-4193-8264-2c1a9cb3475d:6943</guid><dc:creator>robcarrol</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6943</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/08/update-two-thirds-of-oracle-dbas-don-t-apply-security-patches.aspx#comments</comments><description>This scary article reminded me of a conversation I had with a colleague in the middle of a team meeting recently. This centred around the perceived lack of security of SQL Server compared to Oracle and the Slammer worm was cited as an example. The damage...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/2008/02/08/update-two-thirds-of-oracle-dbas-don-t-apply-security-patches.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblogcasts.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6943" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/robcarrol/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category></item></channel></rss>